From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tucker v. Karol

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
Mar 18, 2015
No. 1:15CV17 SNLJ (E.D. Mo. Mar. 18, 2015)

Opinion

No. 1:15CV17 SNLJ

03-18-2015

NORMAN TUCKER, Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA KAROL, Defendant


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on non-party James Geitz's motion for court order for access to the Court. Geitz is not an attorney. Only attorneys can file papers on a party's behalf. 28 U.S.C. § 1654; Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. As a result, the motion is stricken.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Geitz's motion for court order for access to the Court [ECF No. 7] is ordered STRICKEN from the docket.

Dated this 18th day of March, 2015.

/s/_________

STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Tucker v. Karol

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
Mar 18, 2015
No. 1:15CV17 SNLJ (E.D. Mo. Mar. 18, 2015)
Case details for

Tucker v. Karol

Case Details

Full title:NORMAN TUCKER, Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA KAROL, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 18, 2015

Citations

No. 1:15CV17 SNLJ (E.D. Mo. Mar. 18, 2015)