From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tucker v. Express Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 19, 2022
19 Civ. 9840 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2022)

Opinion

19 Civ. 9840 (ER)

07-19-2022

HENRY TUCKER, Plaintiff, v. EXPRESS, INC., Defendants.


ORDER

EDGARDO RAMOS, DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within forty-five (45) days of the date hereof.

Any application to reopen must be filed within forty-five days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties are advised that if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next forty-five (45) days with a request that the agreement be “so ordered” by the Court.

All deadlines are vacated and all appearances are canceled.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tucker v. Express Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 19, 2022
19 Civ. 9840 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Tucker v. Express Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HENRY TUCKER, Plaintiff, v. EXPRESS, INC., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 19, 2022

Citations

19 Civ. 9840 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2022)