From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tucker v. Eiker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 31, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-1599 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-1599

08-31-2012

HERMAN ALVIN TUCKER, JR., Plaintiff, v. RYAN EIKER, et al., Defendants.


(JUDGE CAPUTO)


(MAGISTRATE JUDGE CARLSON)


ORDER

NOW, this 31th day of August, 2012, upon review of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 31) for clear error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Plaintiff has previously been granted two extensions of time to file objections to the Report and Recommendation. (Docs. 33; 39.) The second extension directed Plaintiff to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, on or before July 26, 2012. (Doc. 39.) As over a month has passed since the deadline to file objections without a request from Plaintiff for a third extension, the Report and Recommendation is ripe for review.

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 31) is ADOPTED in its entirety.
(2) Plaintiff's official capacity, excessive force under the Fourteenth Amendment, falsification of the official police report, conspiracy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, official capacity punitive damages, and Eight Amendment deliberate indifference claims are DISMISSED.
(3) The matter is RECOMMITTED to Magistrate Judge Carlson.

_________________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Tucker v. Eiker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 31, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-1599 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2012)
Case details for

Tucker v. Eiker

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN ALVIN TUCKER, JR., Plaintiff, v. RYAN EIKER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 31, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-1599 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2012)