From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tucker v. Bernzomatic

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 4, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-05881 (E.D. Pa. May. 4, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-05881.

May 4, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2010, in consideration of defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's demand for punitive damages, plaintiff's response and defendants' reply it is ORDERED that defendants' motion is GRANTED and plaintiff's demand for punitive damages is DISMISSED with leave to amend within fourteen days from the date of this Order.


Summaries of

Tucker v. Bernzomatic

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 4, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-05881 (E.D. Pa. May. 4, 2010)
Case details for

Tucker v. Bernzomatic

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS TUCKER v. BERNZOMATIC, et al

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 4, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-05881 (E.D. Pa. May. 4, 2010)

Citing Cases

Schmidt v. City Ctr. Annex

"Pennsylvania law provides that 'punitive damages are an 'extreme remedy' available only in the most…

Russell v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C.

"[P]unitive damages are an extreme remedy available only in the most exceptional circumstances." Tucker v.…