From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tucker v. Allianceone, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Jul 12, 2010
CASE NO. 7:08-CV-106 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Jul. 12, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 7:08-CV-106 (HL).

July 12, 2010


ORDER


Before the Court is Plaintiff's and Defendant AllianceOne Receivable Management, Inc.'s Joint Motion to Dismiss AllianceOne Receivable Management, Inc. With Prejudice (Doc. 12). In the Joint Motion, Plaintiff and AllianceOne move the Court for an order dismissing AllianceOne from this action with prejudice.

According to the Joint Motion, the proper name of the Defendant is AllianceOne Receivables Management, Inc., not AllianceOne, Inc.

Plaintiff and AllianceOne cite Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) as authorizing the Court to dismiss the action against AllianceOne. Rule 41, however, does not permit the Court to dismiss a party. Instead, it allows the Court to dismiss an action. ("Except as provided in Rule 41(a)(1), an action may be dismissed at the plaintiff's request only by court order, on terms that the court considers proper.") Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2) (emphasis added). In contrast, the governing rule for dismissing a party from a case is Rule 21. That rule provides that "on motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party." Fed.R.Civ.P. 21.

Plaintiff and AllianceOne are ordered to file a joint motion under Rule 21 if they wish to drop AllianceOne from the case. This motion must be filed on or before July 16, 2010.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tucker v. Allianceone, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Jul 12, 2010
CASE NO. 7:08-CV-106 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Jul. 12, 2010)
Case details for

Tucker v. Allianceone, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID B. TUCKER, Plaintiff, v. ALLIANCEONE, INC. and HSBC BANK USA N.A.…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division

Date published: Jul 12, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 7:08-CV-106 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Jul. 12, 2010)