From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TUCK v. GILLIGAN

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
May 6, 2011
No. 3:10-1054 (M.D. Tenn. May. 6, 2011)

Opinion

No. 3:10-1054.

May 6, 2011


ORDER


Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 17) to grant Defendant Candice Gilligan's motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 12) to which Plaintiff filed objections. (Docket Entry No. 16).

After de novo review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 17) and Plaintiff's claims against the Defendant Candice Gilligan are DISMISSED with prejudice against Defendant Candice Gilligan.

As to the John Doe Defendants, this action has been pending since November 2010, Plaintiff has ninety (90) days to serve discovery request upon the records custodian of the Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute to identify the John Doe Defendants for service of process. Plaintiff's failure to do so shall be grounds for dismissal of this action.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

TUCK v. GILLIGAN

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
May 6, 2011
No. 3:10-1054 (M.D. Tenn. May. 6, 2011)
Case details for

TUCK v. GILLIGAN

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE ALEXANDER TUCK, Plaintiff, v. CANDICE GILLIGAN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: May 6, 2011

Citations

No. 3:10-1054 (M.D. Tenn. May. 6, 2011)