From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tubin v. Springfield Fire Marine Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 1, 1928
222 App. Div. 852 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

January, 1928

Present — Hubbs, P.J., Clark, Sears, Crouch and Sawyer, JJ.


Order modified so as to provide for consolidation of all the actions except that of Tubin v. Springfield Fire Marine Ins. Co. of Springfield, Mass., and Another ( Action No. 2), and further to provide that the successful party in the consolidated action, if the plaintiff, may tax as costs only such costs as he would have been entitled to had the action been originally brought in the consolidated form against all the defendants, and that a successful party, if a defendant, may tax with its costs such costs as have heretofore accrued to it in the unconsolidated actions, and as so modified the order is affirmed without costs of this appeal to either party, on the ground that the action against the Springfield Fire and Marine Insurance Company involves a question of res adjudicata and proof in respect to this would be prejudicial to the substantial rights of the other insurance companies defendants to have the value of the insured property determined as an original matter, and that the plaintiff asking for consolidation of actions which he could originally have joined in one action should not in the absence of special circumstances be entitled to greater costs than if he had originally brought but one action. All concur.


Summaries of

Tubin v. Springfield Fire Marine Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 1, 1928
222 App. Div. 852 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Tubin v. Springfield Fire Marine Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:ESTER TUBIN, Plaintiff, v. SPRINGFIELD FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1928

Citations

222 App. Div. 852 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Citing Cases

Hull v. Shannon

Present — Sears, P.J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ. [ 139 Misc. 564.] Following the…