Tube City Ims Corp. v. Allianz Global Risks US Ins. Co.

Full title: TUBE CITY IMS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ALLIANZ GLOBAL RISKS US INSURANCE…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 24, 2014

2:14cv1245 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 24, 2014)

Opinion

2:14cv1245

11-24-2014

TUBE CITY IMS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ALLIANZ GLOBAL RISKS US INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

cc: Jeanette H. Ho, Esquire Mark Gordon, Esquire James M. Hoey, Esquire Paul K. Geer, Esquire Tara L. Maczuzak, Esquire Thomas S. Gozdziak, Esquire (Via CM/ECF Electronic Mail)

Judge Cercone

Electronic Filing
Magistrate Judge Mitchell
MEMORANDUM ORDER

AND NOW, this 24^th day of November, 2014, after the Defendant, Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company, removed the action that the plaintiff, Tube City IMS Corporation, had filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County to this Court, and after a motion to remand was submitted by the plaintiff, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties a period of time after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by the plaintiff and the response to those objections filed by the defendant, and upon independent review of the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 20), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to remand (ECF No. 3) is DENIED.

/s/________

David Stewart Cercone

United States District Judge
cc: Jeanette H. Ho, Esquire

Mark Gordon, Esquire

James M. Hoey, Esquire

Paul K. Geer, Esquire

Tara L. Maczuzak, Esquire

Thomas S. Gozdziak, Esquire

(Via CM/ECF Electronic Mail)