From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tsiamis v. Liu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 29, 1999
259 A.D.2d 746 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

March 29, 1999

Appeal from the order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The affirmed reports of Dr. Kenneth Falvo and Dr. R. C. Krishna which the defendant submitted in support of his motion for summary judgment failed to establish the defendant's entitlement to judgment as a matter of law ( see, Maisonaves v. Friedman, 255 A.D.2d 494; Bocci v. Turkowitz, 255 A.D.2d 476; Pietrocola v. Battibulli, 238 A.D.2d 864; Flanagan v. Hoeg, 212 A.D.2d 756). Accordingly, summary judgment was properly denied.

Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tsiamis v. Liu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 29, 1999
259 A.D.2d 746 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Tsiamis v. Liu

Case Details

Full title:ANGELA TSIAMIS, Respondent, v. WEN CHAUN LIU, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 29, 1999

Citations

259 A.D.2d 746 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
685 N.Y.S.2d 643

Citing Cases

Spain v. New York City Transit Authority [2d Dept 1999

In support of their respective cross motions for summary judgment, the respondents submitted medical reports…

Spain v. New York City Transit Authority

In support of their respective cross motions for summary judgment, the respondents submitted medical reports…