From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tsakos v. Erie County Board of Elections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 11, 1981
83 A.D.2d 983 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

September 11, 1981

Appeal from the Erie Supreme Court, Wolf, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Cardamone, Callahan, Denman and Schnepp, JJ. (Decided Aug. 26, 1981.)


Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: On appeals from orders of Special Term dismissing petitions to invalidate the designating petitions of candidates for town offices in the Town of Evans, appellants argue that the petitions are defective because they failed to include both the post-office addresses and places of residence of candidates. Strict conformity with the provisions of subdivision 1 of section 6-132 Elec. of the Election Law is required where an opportunity for deception or likelihood of confusion exists. Special Term found no such deception or confusion. The candidates used their proper street addresses and all post-office addresses which were designated are all included geographically in the Town of Evans (see Matter of Ferris v. Sadowski, 45 N.Y.2d 815, 817).


Summaries of

Tsakos v. Erie County Board of Elections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 11, 1981
83 A.D.2d 983 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

Tsakos v. Erie County Board of Elections

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE S. TSAKOS, Appellant, v. ERIE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 11, 1981

Citations

83 A.D.2d 983 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

Matter of King v. Sunderland

The candidates' addresses listed on the petitions were sufficient to identify the candidates to the signers.…

LO RUSSO v. ERIE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Same memorandum as in Tsakos v. Erie County Bd. of Elections ( 83…