Opinion
March 30, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Burrows, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
On the record before us, we find that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting a conditional preclusion order in lieu of dismissing the complaint for failure to timely serve a timely bill of particulars. Harwood, J.P., Eiber, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.