From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Truong v. Hoshino

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 10, 2010
No. CIV S-08-2831 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-2831 MCE DAD P.

February 10, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff has filed an appeal from this court's dismissal of the action. On January 28, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The motion will be denied without prejudice so that plaintiff may file his motion directly with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit using the form provided by that court.

On October 29, 2009, plaintiff's March 9, 2009 application to proceed in forma pauperis was denied without prejudice because it was incomplete. In addition, the filing fee was paid in this court by defendant Hoshino when the action was removed from the Sacramento County Superior Court.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's January 28, 2010 motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 25) is denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Truong v. Hoshino

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 10, 2010
No. CIV S-08-2831 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2010)
Case details for

Truong v. Hoshino

Case Details

Full title:TAI TRUONG, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN HOSHINO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 10, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-08-2831 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2010)