From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trung Quang Phan v. Beard

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Sep 30, 2014
584 F. App'x 841 (9th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 13-15911

09-30-2014

TRUNG QUANG PHAN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JEFFREY BEARD, Respondent - Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 4:11-cv-05286-PJH MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding
Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

California state prisoner Trung Quang Phan appeals from the district court's judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as untimely. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo a district court's dismissal of a federal habeas petition on statute of limitations grounds, and the denial of an evidentiary hearing for abuse of discretion. See Mendoza v. Carey, 449 F.3d 1065, 1068 (9th Cir. 2006). We affirm.

Phan, whose native language is Vietnamese, contends that he is entitled to equitable tolling because of his lack of English proficiency, the absence of Vietnamese language legal materials in the prison, and his inability to obtain assistance to file a federal habeas petition until 2010. This contention fails because Phan has not shown that he diligently attempted to procure either legal materials in Vietnamese or assistance in filing his federal habeas petition. See Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631, 649 (2010) (to be entitled to equitable tolling, a petitioner must demonstrate diligence); Mendoza, 449 F.3d at 1070 (discussing showing a non-English speaker must make to qualify for equitable tolling).

Phan also contends that the district court erred by failing to hold an evidentiary hearing regarding his equitable tolling argument. Because Phan failed to make allegations regarding his diligence that would, if true, entitle him to equitable tolling, the district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the petition without holding an evidentiary hearing. See Roy v. Lampert, 465 F.3d 964, 969 (9th Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Trung Quang Phan v. Beard

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Sep 30, 2014
584 F. App'x 841 (9th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Trung Quang Phan v. Beard

Case Details

Full title:TRUNG QUANG PHAN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JEFFREY BEARD, Respondent …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 30, 2014

Citations

584 F. App'x 841 (9th Cir. 2014)