From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trumbley v. New York Central Hudson River RR

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1910
138 App. Div. 928 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)

Opinion

May, 1910.


We have heretofore granted the defendant leave to apply to the trial justice for a resettlement of the case so as to have it appear by proper certificate that it contains all the evidence and proceedings on the trial. (See 136 App. Div 935.) It is not our province to suggest to the learned trial justice what evidence shall be inserted in the case or omitted therefrom. That is solely his function. But we think he should settle the case in such a way that he can make such certificate and that the parties are as a matter of right entitled thereto. Until such certificate is made the case is not in readiness for reargument. The motion for postponement of the argument is, therefore, granted. Motion to strike case from calendar granted.


Summaries of

Trumbley v. New York Central Hudson River RR

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1910
138 App. Div. 928 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Case details for

Trumbley v. New York Central Hudson River RR

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM A. TRUMBLEY, Respondent, v . THE NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 1, 1910

Citations

138 App. Div. 928 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)