From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trujillo v. Jacquez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 15, 2013
Case No. C 10-5183 YGR (NJV) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. C 10-5183 YGR (NJV)

04-15-2013

MARIO TRUJILLO, Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, et al., Defendants.


[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO

CORRESPOND WITH INMATE MCCOY

ON A ONE-TIME BASIS FOR

DISCOVERY PURPOSES

On June 12, 2012, Plaintiff Mario Trujillo, a Pelican Bay State Prison (Pelican Bay) inmate, moved for an order permitting him to correspond in writing with fellow Pelican Bay inmate McCoy (T-69025) on a one-time basis in an effort to secure a declaration from him. (See Docket No. 85.) Plaintiff alleges that inmate McCoy was an eyewitness to the excessive force allegedly used against Plaintiff by some of the Defendants in this action on February 16, 2009, and that he needs McCoy's declaration to prosecute his case. (Id.) Plaintiff further contends that he had previously requested permission from prison-staff to communicate with this inmate, but his request was denied. (Id.)

On March 29, 2013, Judge Gonzalez-Rogers referred this matter to this Court to make findings and recommendations as to why Plaintiff should not be allowed to obtain a declaration from inmate McCoy. (Docket No. 109.) On April 8, 2013, this Court held a telephonic hearing on the matter. During the hearing, Defendants' counsel informed the Court that the Captain in charge of Plaintiff's housing unit would permit correspondence between the two inmates on a one-time basis, so long as Plaintiff provides proof that legal discovery is needed in this action. Plaintiff stated during the hearing that discovery has been permitted in this case and that inmate McCoy's declaration is needed for the prosecution thereof.

Accordingly, after finding good cause, the Court hereby orders that Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. Pelican Bay staff shall allow Plaintiff to correspond with inmate McCoy (T-69025) on a one-time basis in an effort to obtain a declaration from him. In doing so, however, Plaintiff must follow Pelican Bay's internal procedures for corresponding with another inmate. Specifically, Plaintiff shall re-submit a "CDCR Form 22" to his assigned counselor accompanied with a copy of this order. See PBSP D.O.M. Supp. § 54010.

___________

The Honorable Nandor J. Vadas

United States Magistrate Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Case Name: M. Trujillo v. Jacquez, et al. No. C 10-5183 YGR I hereby certify that on April 10, 2013 , I electronically filed the following documents with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system:

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CORRESPOND WITH INMATE MCCOY ON A ONE-TIME BASIS FOR DISCOVERY PURPOSES

Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the CM/ECF system. I am employed in the Office of the Attorney General, which is the office of a member of the California State Bar at which member's direction this service is made. I am 18 years of age or older and not a party to this matter. I am familiar with the business practice at the Office of the Attorney General for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. In accordance with that practice, correspondence placed in the internal mail collection system at the Office of the Attorney General is deposited with the United States Postal Service with postage thereon fully prepaid that same day in the ordinary course of business. I further certify that some of the participants in the case are not registered CM/ECF users. On April 10, 2013 , I have caused to be mailed in the Office of the Attorney General's internal mail system, the foregoing document(s) by First-Class Mail, postage prepaid, or have dispatched it to a third party commercial carrier for delivery within three (3) calendar days to the following non-CM/ECF participants: Mario Trujillo (F-99682)
Pelican Bay State Prison
P.O. Box 7000
Crescent City, CA 95531-7000
Pro Se
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on April 10, 2013 , at San Francisco, California.

M. Luna

Declarant

___________

Signature


Summaries of

Trujillo v. Jacquez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 15, 2013
Case No. C 10-5183 YGR (NJV) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Trujillo v. Jacquez

Case Details

Full title:MARIO TRUJILLO, Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 15, 2013

Citations

Case No. C 10-5183 YGR (NJV) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2013)

Citing Cases

Ruiz v. Ahern

For example, in Truijillo v. Jacquez, the defendant prison warden conducted an inquiry into the plaintiff's…

Borja v. Williams

However, plaintiff could still theoretically prevail on her § 1983 excessive force claim without necessarily…