Opinion
Argued February 8, 1895
Decided March 19, 1895
Louis Marshall for appellant.
C.G. Baldwin for respondent.
O'BRIEN, J., reads for reversal.
All concur, except GRAY and BARTLETT, JJ., dissenting.
Judgment reversed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Truesdell v. Bourke
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 19, 1895
40 N.E. 83 (N.Y. 1895)
Summaries of
Truesdell v. Bourke
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 19, 1895
40 N.E. 83 (N.Y. 1895)
Case details for
Truesdell v. Bourke
Case Details
Full title:JOHN W. TRUESDELL, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v . HANNIE L…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 19, 1895
Citations
40 N.E. 83 (N.Y. 1895)
40 N.E. 83
71 N.Y. St. Rptr. 364
Citing Cases
Zeiser v. Cohn
The law will not permit a recovery by proof of a right of action upon contract or of some other character,…
Postal v. CohnThe law will not permit a recovery by proof of a right of action upon contract or of some other character,…