Opinion
Civil Action 22-1597
01-29-2024
ALLIE TRUESDALE, Plaintiff, v. ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK D/B/A EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER AND THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY, Defendants.
ORDER
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
AND NOW, this 29th day of January 2024, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 30), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendants' Motion (Doc. No. 33), Defendants' Reply (Doc. No. 38), and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 30) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:
1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 30) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claims of retaliation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”), and Philadelphia Fair Practices Ordinance (“PFPO”) in Counts One, Two, and Three of the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 19).
2. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 30) is DENIED as to Plaintiff's disability discrimination claims under the ADA, PHRA, and PFPO in Counts One, Two, and Three of the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 19).
3. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 30) is DENIED as to Plaintiff's failure to accommodate claims under the ADA, PHRA, and PFPO in Counts One, Two, and Three of the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 19).