From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Truel v. Celeski

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 3, 2012
Case No. 11-10921 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 3, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 11-10921

02-03-2012

CHRISTOPHER TRUEL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL CELESKI, JOE DOULETTE and JEFFERY GEISINGER, Defendants.


Hon: AVERN COHN


ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS'

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 18)

and

ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT

For the reasons stated on the record on February 01, 2012, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on the Pleadings Or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 18) is DENIED without prejudice.

Plaintiff is allowed to file an amended complaint within fifteen (15) days.

SO ORDERED.

_________

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of record on this date, February 3, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Julie Owens

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160


Summaries of

Truel v. Celeski

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 3, 2012
Case No. 11-10921 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Truel v. Celeski

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER TRUEL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL CELESKI, JOE DOULETTE and JEFFERY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 3, 2012

Citations

Case No. 11-10921 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 3, 2012)