From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trueblood v. Dixon

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Jan 20, 2022
4:20cv560-MW/MAF (N.D. Fla. Jan. 20, 2022)

Opinion

4:20cv560-MW/MAF

01-20-2022

WILMARIO DEVONDRIC TRUEBLOOD, Petitioner, v. RICKY D. DIXON, [1] Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

MARK E. WALKER CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 20, and has also reviewed de novo Petitioner's objections, ECF No. 27. This Court notes that Petitioner's objection that his counsel's Rule 3.850 hearing testimony contradicted her motion for psychiatric evaluation is belied by the record, in which defense counsel explained to the court, at the time her motion for a second competency evaluation was pending, that “what [she] wanted was really a mitigation specialist, ” and she felt like she “really didn't have a choice but to [file her motion for a second competency evaluation.]” ECF No. 11-1 at 246-47. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation, ECF No. 20, is accepted and adopted, over the Petitioner's objections, as this Court's opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “The petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, is DENIED.” A certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Clerk shall close the file.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Trueblood v. Dixon

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Jan 20, 2022
4:20cv560-MW/MAF (N.D. Fla. Jan. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Trueblood v. Dixon

Case Details

Full title:WILMARIO DEVONDRIC TRUEBLOOD, Petitioner, v. RICKY D. DIXON, [1…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Florida

Date published: Jan 20, 2022

Citations

4:20cv560-MW/MAF (N.D. Fla. Jan. 20, 2022)