Summary
In Truax v. Slater, EARL, J., held that "the mere declarations of an assignor of a chose in action, forming no part of any res gestæ, are not competent to prejudice the title of his assignee, whether the assignee be one for value, or merely a trustee for creditors and whether such declarations be antecedent or subsequent to the assignment."
Summary of this case from Bush et al. v. RobertsOpinion
Argued October 12, 1881
Decided October 25, 1881
Blumenstiel Hirsch for appellants.
Chauncey S. Truax for respondent.
EARL, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur, except MILLER, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.