From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tru-Balance, LLC v. Alcoa, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 16, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01127-CMA-BNB (D. Colo. Mar. 16, 2012)

Summary

adopting recommendation that granted motion for stay and recommended administrative closure

Summary of this case from Henn v. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins. Co.

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01127-CMA-BNB

03-16-2012

TRU-BALANCE, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. ALCOA, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation, Defendant.


Judge Christine M. Arguello


ORDER AFFIRMING FEBRUARY 27, 2012 ORDER AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on the February 27, 2012 Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland (Doc. # 47), in which he ordered that Defendant Alcoa's Motion to Stay (Doc. # 24) be granted, and recommended that thecase be closed administratively subject to reopening for good cause. The Recom- mendation is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (Doc. # 47 at 4 n.1.) Despite this advisement, no objections to Magistrate Judge Boland's Recommendation have been filed by either party. "In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate [judge's] report under any standard it deems appropriate." Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (stating that "[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings.").

The Court has reviewed all the relevant pleadings concerning Defendant's Motion to Stay and the Recommendation. Based on this review, the Court concludes that "there is no clear error on the face of the record." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee's note. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Boland as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 47) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Stay (Doc. # 24) be GRANTED and that this case be ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED, subject to reopening for good cause.

BY THE COURT:

____________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Tru-Balance, LLC v. Alcoa, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 16, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01127-CMA-BNB (D. Colo. Mar. 16, 2012)

adopting recommendation that granted motion for stay and recommended administrative closure

Summary of this case from Henn v. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins. Co.
Case details for

Tru-Balance, LLC v. Alcoa, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TRU-BALANCE, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Plaintiff, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Mar 16, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01127-CMA-BNB (D. Colo. Mar. 16, 2012)

Citing Cases

Henn v. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins. Co.

The Court respectfully RECOMMENDS that the case be ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2,…