From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trs. of the Operating Engineers' Local 324 Pension Fund v. Moss Constr. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 16, 2012
Case No. 09-14425 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 16, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 09-14425

04-16-2012

TRUSTEES OF THE OPERATING ENGINEERS' LOCAL 324 PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE OPERATING ENGINEERS' LOCAL 324 HEALTH CARE PLAN, TRUSTEES OF THE OPERATING ENGINEERS' LOCAL 324 VACATION & HOLIDAY FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE OPERATING ENGINEERS' LOCAL 324 RETIREE BENEFIT FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE OPERATING ENGINEERS' LOCAL 324 APPRENTICESHIP FUND, and TRUSTEES OF THE OPERATING ENGINEERS' LOCAL 324 DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN, Plaintiffs, v. MOSS CONSTRUCTION CO., HOMER MOSS, JR., THADDEUS MOSS, and RECIE MOSS, Defendants.


Honorable David M. Lawson


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO AMEND CONSENT JUDGMENT

Presently before the Court is the plaintiffs' motion to amend the consent judgment in this case. In this district, movants must seek concurrence in the relief requested before filing a motion or request with this Court. E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(a). If concurrence is obtained, the parties then may present a stipulated order to the Court. If concurrence is not obtained, Local Rule 7.1(a)(2) requires that the moving party state in the motion that "there was a conference between the attorneys . . . in which the movant explained the nature of the motion and its legal basis and requested but did not obtain concurrence in the relief sought [ ] or . . . despite reasonable efforts specified in the motion, the movant was unable to conduct a conference." E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(a)(2).

The plaintiffs do not state in their motion that concurrence was sought from the defendants before filing the motion. "It is not up to the Court to expend its energies when the parties have not sufficiently expended their own." Hasbro, Inc. v. Serafino, 168 F.R.D. 99, 101 (D. Mass. 1996). The plaintiffs have filed their motion in violation of the applicable rules.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the plaintiffs' motion to amend consent judgment [dkt. #57] is DENIED.

____________________________

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on April 16, 2012.

Deborah R. Tofil

DEBORAH R. TOFIL


Summaries of

Trs. of the Operating Engineers' Local 324 Pension Fund v. Moss Constr. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 16, 2012
Case No. 09-14425 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Trs. of the Operating Engineers' Local 324 Pension Fund v. Moss Constr. Co.

Case Details

Full title:TRUSTEES OF THE OPERATING ENGINEERS' LOCAL 324 PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 16, 2012

Citations

Case No. 09-14425 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 16, 2012)