From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trs. of Iron Workers Local Union 17 Pension Fund v. 21ST Century Concrete Constr. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Apr 19, 2019
CASE NO. 1:18-cv-2737 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 19, 2019)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:18-cv-2737

04-19-2019

TRUSTEES OF THE IRON WORKERS LOCAL UNION 17 PENSION FUND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. 21ST CENTURY CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION INC., Defendant.


OPINION & ORDER
[Resolving Doc. 17] :

In this employee benefits case, Defendant 21st Century Concrete Construction, Inc.'s attorney seeks to withdraw. He claims, inter alia, that Defendant has failed substantially to fulfill certain obligations and has made its representation unreasonably difficult.

Doc. 17.

Id.

However, a corporation is not permitted to proceed pro se in federal court. Put differently, Defendant needs an attorney. Accordingly, the Court DENIES defense counsel's motion to withdraw until Defendant has substitute counsel.

E.g., Bass v. Leatherwood, 788 F.3d 228, 230-31 (6th Cir. 2015) ("[U]nder longstanding tradition, a corporation can only appear by attorney." (internal quotation marks and emphasis omitted)). See also 28 U.S.C. § 1654. --------

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 19, 2019

s/ James S . Gwin

JAMES S. GWIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Trs. of Iron Workers Local Union 17 Pension Fund v. 21ST Century Concrete Constr. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Apr 19, 2019
CASE NO. 1:18-cv-2737 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 19, 2019)
Case details for

Trs. of Iron Workers Local Union 17 Pension Fund v. 21ST Century Concrete Constr. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TRUSTEES OF THE IRON WORKERS LOCAL UNION 17 PENSION FUND, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Date published: Apr 19, 2019

Citations

CASE NO. 1:18-cv-2737 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 19, 2019)