Opinion
March, 1916.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred, except Woodward, J., who dissented; Cochrane, J., not sitting.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Troy Waste Manuf. v. N.Y. Cent., Hudson Riv. Rail
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1916
173 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Summaries of
Troy Waste Manuf. v. N.Y. Cent., Hudson Riv. Rail
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1916
173 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for
Troy Waste Manuf. v. N.Y. Cent., Hudson Riv. Rail
Case Details
Full title:Troy Waste Manufacturing Company, Respondent, v. The New York Central and…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: Mar 1, 1916
Citations
173 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)