Opinion
March, 1920.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Woodward and H.T. Kellogg, JJ., dissenting, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of evidence.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Troy v. Rutland Railroad Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1920
191 App. Div. 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
Summaries of
Troy v. Rutland Railroad Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1920
191 App. Div. 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
Case details for
Troy v. Rutland Railroad Company
Case Details
Full title:ROBERTUS F. TROY, Respondent, v. RUTLAND RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: Mar 1, 1920
Citations
191 App. Div. 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)