Opinion
20-cv-10397
06-21-2022
TROY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Plaintiff, v. K.F., et al., Defendants.
Roy H. Henley (P39921) Thrun Law Firm, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jason Daniel Wine (P57906) Attorney for Defendants
Roy H. Henley (P39921) Thrun Law Firm, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Jason Daniel Wine (P57906) Attorney for Defendants
Honorable Denise Page Hood
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE PROPOSED ORDER WITHDRAWING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES
ELIZABETH A. STAFFORD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Defendants moved for an award of attorney's fees for work performed before the federal court. ECF No. 17. The Honorable Denise Page Hood referred the motion to the undersigned for a report and recommendation under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). ECF No. 19. The parties submitted a stipulation and proposed order withdrawing the motion for attorney's fees because they resolved the matter (attached). The Court RECOMMENDS that the proposed order be approved. 1
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES ABOUT OBJECTIONS
Within 14 days of being served with this report and recommendation, any party may serve and file specific written objections to this Court's findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2). If a party fails to timely file specific objections, any further appeal is waived. Howard v. Secretary of HHS, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991). And only the specific objections to this report and recommendation are preserved for appeal; all other objections are waived. Willis v. Secretary of HHS, 931 F.2d 390, 401 (6th Cir. 1991).
Each objection must be labeled as “Objection #1,” “Objection #2,” etc., and must specify precisely the provision of this report and recommendation to which it pertains. Within 14 days after service of objections, any non-objecting party must file a response to the objections, specifically addressing each issue raised in the objections in the same order and labeled as “Response to Objection #1,” “Response to Objection #2,” etc. The response must be concise and proportionate in length and complexity to the objections, but there is otherwise no page limitation. If the Court determines that any objections are without merit, it may rule without awaiting the response. 2
STIPULATION SUPPORTING PROPOSED ORDER WITHDRAWING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES
The parties, through their attorneys, submit that they have resolved Defendants' Motion for Attorney Fees and therefore stipulate to the proposed Order Withdrawing Motion for Attorney Fees filed on June 14, 2022.
ORDER WITHDRAWING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES 3
The Court has been advised that the parties have resolved Defendants' Motion for Attorney Fees. The motion is accordingly withdrawn from the Court's docket, and closes the above matter. 4