From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Troy-McKoy v. Mount Sinai Beth Isr.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 26, 2021
198 A.D.3d 585 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

14487 Index No. 157291/20 Case No.2021–00359

10-26-2021

Dervanna H.A. TROY–MCKOY, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. MOUNT SINAI BETH ISRAEL, Defendant–Respondent.

Dervanna H.A. Troy–McKoy, appellant pro se. Rubin, Fiorella, Friedman & Mercante LLP, New York (Leila Cardo of counsel), for respondent.


Dervanna H.A. Troy–McKoy, appellant pro se.

Rubin, Fiorella, Friedman & Mercante LLP, New York (Leila Cardo of counsel), for respondent.

Gische, J.P., Webber, Mazzarelli, Pitt, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul A. Goetz, J.), entered December 18, 2020, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff's claims are all based on his allegation that a certain affidavit of service contains a forged version of his signature. A review of the affidavit reveals that it does not purport to contain plaintiff's signature at all but only those of the affiant and the notary public. Thus, the complaint was correctly dismissed as conclusively refuted by the documentary evidence, i.e., the affidavit of service.


Summaries of

Troy-McKoy v. Mount Sinai Beth Isr.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 26, 2021
198 A.D.3d 585 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Troy-McKoy v. Mount Sinai Beth Isr.

Case Details

Full title:Dervanna H.A. TROY–MCKOY, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. MOUNT SINAI BETH ISRAEL…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 26, 2021

Citations

198 A.D.3d 585 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
152 N.Y.S.3d 910