From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trowsse v. Hembree

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Nov 8, 2007
Case No. 07-11506 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 8, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 07-11506.

November 8, 2007


ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE WITNESSES


Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Strike Witnesses and Prohibit Testimony at Trial [Docket #12]. For the reasons and under the terms stated on the record on November 8, 2007, the motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows:

1. Witnesses Amanda McMichaels and Samantha McMichaels have been deposed. The motion to strike those witnesses is therefore DENIED AS MOOT.

2. The parties agree that witnesses Destiny Trowsse, Faith Trowsse and Michael Trowse will not be called as witnesses, and may be stricken from Plaintiff's witness list. The motion to strike these witnesses is therefore GRANTED.

3. Plaintiff has agreed to produce Corey Trowsse (Plaintiff's son) for deposition at a time mutually agreeable to Plaintiff's and Defendant's counsel. The motion to strike Corey Trowsse is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If Corey Trowsse does not appear for deposition as agreed by the parties, then Defendant may renew the motion to strike.

4. Witnesses Heather Lee and Andre Wilson were served with deposition subpoenas, but did not appear at their scheduled depositions. It does not appear that the failure of these witnesses to appear for deposition is attributable to the Plaintiff, and striking these witnesses and precluding their trial testimony is not the prescribed remedy at this time. Therefore, the motion to strike these witnesses is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

However, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 45, witnesses Lee and Wilson are subject to contempt of court sanctions if they fail to appear for a deposition after having been properly served with a subpoena. At this time, the Court directs Defendant to serve Lee and Wilson with new subpoenas, along with a copy of this Order. If, after having been properly served, the witness fails to appear for deposition, he or she will be ordered to appear personally before this Court to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for contempt of court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Trowsse v. Hembree

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Nov 8, 2007
Case No. 07-11506 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 8, 2007)
Case details for

Trowsse v. Hembree

Case Details

Full title:ROBIN TROWSSE, Plaintiff, v. HEMBREE City of Pontiac Police Officer…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Nov 8, 2007

Citations

Case No. 07-11506 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 8, 2007)