Opinion
Argued and Submitted Oct. 20, 2005.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)
June Adler, Attorney at Law, Granada Hills, CA, for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee.
Gary M. Spritz, Law Offices of Gary M. Spritz, Malibu, CA, for Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Audrey B. Collins, District Judge, Presiding.
Before FRIEDMAN, O'SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Daniel M. Friedman, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Judy Trowbridge, the putative spouse of decedent Charles Trowbridge, appeals the district court's judgment awarding Charles' pension benefits to Linda Trowbridge, his first wife. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
In this appeal, Judy Trowbridge argues that she, not Linda, was entitled to receive all of Charles' pension benefits other than the community property interest that Linda accrued between 1959 and 1965. We disagree and affirm the judgment for the reasons stated in the district court's Amended Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law After Court Trial, entered November 24, 2003.
AFFIRMED.