From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trout v. Williams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 8, 1929
281 P. 224 (Okla. 1929)

Opinion

No. 19207

Opinion Filed October 8, 1929.

(Syllabus.)

Descent and Distribution — Indians — Devolution of Estate of Child Allottee.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed upon authority of Levina Cooper, nee Perry, v. Spiro State Bank (No. 18265), 137 Okla. 265, 278 P. 648, decided by this court April 10, 1928, and cases therein cited.

Error from District Court, McClain County; Tom P. Pace, Judge.

Action between Ada Trout and others and Sib Williams and others. Judgment for the latter, and the former appeal. Affirmed.

W.H. Woods, A.M. Beets, O.K. Wetzel, and Walter Marlin, for plaintiffs in error.

J.B. Dudley and Glasco, Glasco, for defendants in error.


The question here involved was decided adversely to the contention of plaintiffs in error herein in Lavina, Cooper, nee Perry, v. Spiro State Bank, 137 Okla. 265, 278 P. 648, and the rule therein announced followed in Anna Eva Jacobs, nee Carney, v. Sallie E. Ambrister et al., 137 Okla. 227, 278 P. 653; Lowman v. Sharp, 137 Okla. 300, 279 P. 325; Watson v. Ellis, 137 Okla. 300, 279 P. 325; Watson v. Richards, 137 Okla. 299, 279 P. 326. Said cases are controlling here and decisive of the questions presented in this appeal.

It therefore follows that the judgment appealed from herein must be and the same is hereby affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except RILEY, J., dissenting, and HEFNER, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Trout v. Williams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 8, 1929
281 P. 224 (Okla. 1929)
Case details for

Trout v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:TROUT et al. v. WILLIAMS et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 8, 1929

Citations

281 P. 224 (Okla. 1929)
139 Okla. 58