From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Troup v. Cutshall

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 16, 2006
Civil Action No. 04-114J (W.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-114J.

March 16, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings. On November 12, 2004, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation, docket no. 5, recommending that plaintiff's action should be dismissed if the plaintiff did not file an adequate amended complaint. Plaintiff submitted an unsigned amended complaint, which was returned to him with an explanatory order on November 30, 2004. Plaintiff has filed nothing and has not contacted the court since that time.

Upon de novo review of the record, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2006, it is

ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.


Summaries of

Troup v. Cutshall

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 16, 2006
Civil Action No. 04-114J (W.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2006)
Case details for

Troup v. Cutshall

Case Details

Full title:SHELDON TROUP, Plaintiff, v. JAMES A. CUTSHALL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 16, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 04-114J (W.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2006)