From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Troung v. Employment Division

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 26, 1985
711 P.2d 224 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

85-AB-235-A; A35777

Argued and submitted December 13, 1985.

Affirmed December 26, 1985.

Judicial Review from Employment Appeals Board.

Helen D. Moorman, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Linda DeVries Grimms, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Petitioner was disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits under Employment Division Rules OAR 471-30-036(2) and (3), because he was not medically able to work more than four hours a day. He seeks judicial review. He does not deny that the rules, if valid, require his disqualification. Rather, he argues that the rules exceed the scope of the Division's authority to promulgate. They do not. See Doctor v. Employment Division, 76 Or. App. 650, 711 P.2d 159 (1985); Minton v. Employment Division, 57 Or. App. 348, 644 P.2d 632 (1982).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Troung v. Employment Division

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 26, 1985
711 P.2d 224 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Troung v. Employment Division

Case Details

Full title:TROUNG, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 26, 1985

Citations

711 P.2d 224 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
711 P.2d 224