From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trotter v. People

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 17, 2021
2:21-cv-02266-JDP (HC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-02266-JDP (HC)

12-17-2021

BOBBY EARL TROTTER, Petitioner, v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Respondents.


ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE AN APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY THE FILING FEE

JEREMY D. PETERSON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required $5 filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity either (1) to submit the appropriate affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or (2) to pay the appropriate filing fee.

It is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, either an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee.

2. Petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Trotter v. People

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 17, 2021
2:21-cv-02266-JDP (HC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Trotter v. People

Case Details

Full title:BOBBY EARL TROTTER, Petitioner, v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 17, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-02266-JDP (HC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2021)