From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trotter v. Amerisourcebergen Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Aug 26, 2011
Case No. 2:09-CV-03476-FCD-EFB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-CV-03476-FCD-EFB

08-26-2011

PAUL TROTTER, Plaintiff, v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Defendant.

MELINDA S. RIECHERT, State Bar No. 65504 SHWETA GERA, State Bar No. 234627 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Attorneys for Defendant AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION LAWRANCE A. BOHM, State Bar No. 208716 BOHM LAW GROUP ERIKA M. GASPAR, State Bar No. 238117 LAW OFFICE OF ERIKA M. GASPAR Attorneys for Plaintiff PAUL TROTTER


MELINDA S. RIECHERT, State Bar No. 65504

SHWETA GERA, State Bar No. 234627

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION

LAWRANCE A. BOHM, State Bar No. 208716

BOHM LAW GROUP

ERIKA M. GASPAR, State Bar No. 238117

LAW OFFICE OF ERIKA M. GASPAR

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PAUL TROTTER

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND SUMMARY JUDGMENT DEADLINES

Plaintiff Paul Trotter ("Trotter") and Defendant AmerisourceBergen Corporation ("AmerisourceBergen"), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to modify the summary judgment deadlines set forth by this Court on July 1, 2011.

WHEREAS, Trotter and AmerisourceBergen are engaged in settlement discussions regarding the above-captioned matter;

WHEREAS, the current deadline for a hearing on dispositive motions is September 30, 2011;

WHEREAS, Trotter and AmerisourceBergen request that the Court extend the summary judgment hearing deadline by no less than 30 days to allow them sufficient time to engage in settlement discussions and to finalize the terms of a settlement.

For the foregoing reasons, Trotter and AmerisourceBergen hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the following modifications be made to the Court's Order:

+------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦Previous Date ¦New Date ¦ +------------------------------+------------------+----------------¦ ¦Hearing on Dispositive Motions¦September 30, 2011¦November 4, 2011¦ +------------------------------------------------------------------+

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

Melinda S. Riechert

Attorneys for Defendant

AMERISOURCEBERGEN

CORPORATION

BOHM LAW GROUP

Lawrance A. Bohm

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PAUL TROTTER

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Trotter v. Amerisourcebergen Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Aug 26, 2011
Case No. 2:09-CV-03476-FCD-EFB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Trotter v. Amerisourcebergen Corp.

Case Details

Full title:PAUL TROTTER, Plaintiff, v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION; and DOES 1-100…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Aug 26, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:09-CV-03476-FCD-EFB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2011)