From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trost v. Daniels

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jul 17, 2023
3:22-cv-00205-ART-CLB (D. Nev. Jul. 17, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00205-ART-CLB

07-17-2023

ROY TROST, aka DAISY LYNN MEADOWS, and JUSTIN MENDOZA, aka AMBER RENEE MENDOZA, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES DANIELS, et al. Defendants

AARON D. FORD Attorney General DOUGLAS R. RANDS, Bar No. 3572 Senior Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Interested Party Nevada Department of Corrections MCLETCHIE LAW Margaret A. McLetchie, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10931 Leo S. Wolpert, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs


AARON D. FORD Attorney General DOUGLAS R. RANDS, Bar No. 3572 Senior Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Interested Party Nevada Department of Corrections

MCLETCHIE LAW Margaret A. McLetchie, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10931 Leo S. Wolpert, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING (SECOND REQUEST)

Plaintiffs ROY TROST aka DAISY LYNN MEADOWS, and JUSTIN MENDOZA, aka AMBER RENEE MENDOZA, by and through their attorneys of record, McLetchie Law Group, PLLC and Defendants, Nevada Board of Prison Commissioners et. al., by and through their attorney of record, hereby stipulate and agree that the time for response to the amended complaint in this matter should be extended.

The purpose of the Stipulation is to allow Defendants additional time prepare a response to the second amended complaint in this matter. Due to the trial calendar of Counsel for the Defendants and the necessity to obtain requests for representation from the multiple Defendants sued in this matter, additional time is required and requested. Additionally, this matter was recently returned, internally, from the complex litigation division of the Office of the Attorney General to Counsel for the response. There was not sufficient notice of this return for Counsel to respond adequately to this complaint. Therefore, the parties stipulate that the Defendants shall have additional time to respond to the second amended complaint in this matter. The new deadline for this response would be 30 days from the date the response is currently due. The Parties respectfully request that this Court approve the new deadline of August 14, 2023.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED this 14th day of July, 2023

ORDER

Accordingly, Defendants shall have until August 14, 2023 to file their responsive pleading. No further extensions will be granted under any circumstances.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Trost v. Daniels

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jul 17, 2023
3:22-cv-00205-ART-CLB (D. Nev. Jul. 17, 2023)
Case details for

Trost v. Daniels

Case Details

Full title:ROY TROST, aka DAISY LYNN MEADOWS, and JUSTIN MENDOZA, aka AMBER RENEE…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jul 17, 2023

Citations

3:22-cv-00205-ART-CLB (D. Nev. Jul. 17, 2023)