From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tross v. Ritz Carlton Hotel Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Feb 13, 2013
CIVIL CASE NO. 3:11-cv-1326 (JCH) (D. Conn. Feb. 13, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL CASE NO. 3:11-cv-1326 (JCH)

02-13-2013

JONATHAN TROSS, Plaintiff, v. RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COMPANY, LLC, ET AL., Defendants.


RULING RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL (DOC. NO. 75)

Defendants' Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 75), which seeks to compel the records of plaintiff's wife's counselor, Dawn Recinos, is DENIED. The plaintiff's wife seeks damages for loss of consortium and does not assert a claim for mental or emotional distress. At most, "garden variety damages" would be recoverable. See Sims v. Blot (In re Sims), 534 F.3d 117, 141 (2d Cir. 2008); Safeco Ins. Co. v. Vecsey, 259 F.R.D. 23, 30 (D. Conn. 2009).

SO ORDERED.

Dated at New Haven, Connecticut this 13th day of February, 2013.

________________________

Janet C. Hall

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Tross v. Ritz Carlton Hotel Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Feb 13, 2013
CIVIL CASE NO. 3:11-cv-1326 (JCH) (D. Conn. Feb. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Tross v. Ritz Carlton Hotel Co.

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN TROSS, Plaintiff, v. RITZ CARLTON HOTEL COMPANY, LLC, ET AL.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Date published: Feb 13, 2013

Citations

CIVIL CASE NO. 3:11-cv-1326 (JCH) (D. Conn. Feb. 13, 2013)