Trombley v. State

Full title: RICHARD L. TROMBLEY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 26, 1989

541 So. 2d 798 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-0662.

April 26, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; M. Daniel Futch, Jr., Judge.

Harry Gulkin of Harry Gulkin, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Alfonso M. Saldana, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

As to the admissibility of the tape recordings, we affirm upon the authority of Odum v. State, 403 So.2d 936 (Fla. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 925, 102 S.Ct. 1970, 72 L.Ed.2d 440 (1982), Tumulty v. State, 489 So.2d 150 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), and section 934.03(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1985).

As to the admissibility of the "battered woman syndrome" evidence, we affirm upon the authority of Kruse v. State, 483 So.2d 1383 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), rev. dismissed, 507 So.2d 588 (Fla. 1987), Terry v. State, 467 So.2d 761, 764 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), rev. denied, 476 So.2d 675 (Fla. 1985), and State v. Ciskie, 110 Wn.2d 263, 268, 751 P.2d 1165, 1170 (1988).

As to the imposition of consecutive sentences, we affirm upon the authority of Murray v. State, 491 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 1986).

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GARRETT, JJ., concur.