From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trombley v. Justice's Court

Supreme Court of California
May 3, 1948
31 Cal.2d 868 (Cal. 1948)

Opinion

Docket No. S.F. 17549.

May 3, 1948.

PROCEEDING for a writ of certiorari. Judgment affirmed.

Francis T. Cornish for Petitioner.

Fred N. Howser, Attorney General, Herbert E. Wenig, Deputy Attorney General, Francis W. Collins, District Attorney, and Douglas N. Quinlan, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondents.

Samuel S. Berman, Harold J. Fisher and Leon E. Gold, as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondents.


THE COURT.

This application for a writ of certiorari seeks the same relief as was sought by the petition for habeas corpus in In re Trombley, ante, p. 801 [ 193 P.2d 734], this day filed. The decision in that proceeding is determinative of all issues raised by the present petition, and, accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Trombley v. Justice's Court

Supreme Court of California
May 3, 1948
31 Cal.2d 868 (Cal. 1948)
Case details for

Trombley v. Justice's Court

Case Details

Full title:WALTER TROMBLEY, Petitioner, v. JUSTICE'S COURT OF TOWNSHIP FIFTEEN…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: May 3, 1948

Citations

31 Cal.2d 868 (Cal. 1948)
199 P.2d 5

Citing Cases

Schiefer v. State

This action affected a circumvention of Wyo. Const. art. 1, § 5 by using the form of imposition of…

Alhino v. Starr

The only question is whether Alhino adduced any substantial evidence to support a verdict that the attorney…