From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trombetta v. Novocin

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 19, 2022
Civil Action 18 Civ. 993 (RA) (SLC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 18 Civ. 993 (RA) (SLC)

12-19-2022

ANNAMARIE TROMBETTA, Plaintiff, v. NORB NOVOCIN, MARIE NOVOCIN, ESTATE AUCTIONS, INC., AND WORTHPOINT CORPORATION, Defendants.


ORDER

SARAH L. CAVE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court is in receipt of pro se Plaintiff Annamarie Trombetta's (“Ms. Trombetta”) letter dated December 16, 2022, (ECF No. 338), and orders as follows:

1. Because the only outstanding discovery issue that Ms. Trombetta identifies is something that the Court has deemed resolved (see ECF No. 327), the Court deems fact discovery to be closed at this time.

2. Ms. Trombetta is permitted, but not required, to attach exhibits to her proposed amended complaint. As the Court has stated no less than ten times (see ECF Nos. 221; 236; 238; 244; 271; 286; 297; 302; 321; 333), to the extent Ms. Trombetta raises merits issues for the Court's consideration, the Court reaffirms that any evidentiary or merits issues are not yet ripe, and may be appropriately raised at the summary judgment and/or trial stages of this case. Though the Court is permitting Ms. Trombetta to attach exhibits to her proposed amended complaint, it shall not be an avenue to subvert the posture of this case.

3. To the extent Ms. Trombetta seeks an extension of time to serve expert disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) on Defendants, her request is DENIED. On December 12, 2022, the Court advised Ms. Trombetta that “[n]o further extensions of the deadlines in this Order[,]” including the expert discovery deadlines, “shall be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.” (ECF No. 333 at 2). Ms. Trombetta now, on the eve of her deadline to serve expert disclosures pursuant to Rule 26(a)(2), requests an extension to the discovery deadline. The Court shall not grant such a request because Ms. Trombetta has failed to articulate extraordinary circumstances that warrant the requested relief. Ms. Trombetta has been made aware that expert discovery shall follow fact discovery (see e.g., ECF Nos. 195; 234; 291; 308; 333), and advised by the Court what her responsibilities are. (ECF No. 328 at 41-42). If Ms. Trombetta remains interested in pursuing expert discovery, she must comply with the Court's deadline, as outlined in ECF No. 333.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to Ms. Trombetta at the address below.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Trombetta v. Novocin

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 19, 2022
Civil Action 18 Civ. 993 (RA) (SLC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Trombetta v. Novocin

Case Details

Full title:ANNAMARIE TROMBETTA, Plaintiff, v. NORB NOVOCIN, MARIE NOVOCIN, ESTATE…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 19, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 18 Civ. 993 (RA) (SLC) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2022)