From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Troche v. Quezada

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 26, 2022
22 Civ. 8988 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 26, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 8988 (AT)

10-26-2022

MIGUEL TROCHE, Plaintiff, v. LUIS F. QUEZADA and CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC., Defendants.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, District Judge:

To protect the public health, while promoting the “just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding,” Fed.R.Civ.P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place “before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28” if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear' and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at eveiy available opportunity.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Troche v. Quezada

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 26, 2022
22 Civ. 8988 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Troche v. Quezada

Case Details

Full title:MIGUEL TROCHE, Plaintiff, v. LUIS F. QUEZADA and CLEAN HARBORS…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 26, 2022

Citations

22 Civ. 8988 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 26, 2022)