From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Troche v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 16, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-4483 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 16, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-4483

02-16-2012

ISMAEL CAMACHO TROCHE v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE


ORDER

AND NOW, this 16th day of February, 2012, upon careful and independent consideration of plaintiff Ismael Camacho Troche's ("Camacho") brief and statement of issues in support of request for review (docket entry # 8), defendant Michael J. Astrue's response thereto (docket entry # 10), plaintiff's reply (docket entry # 12), and the Honorable Jacob P. Hart's report and recommendation (docket entry # 13), to which neither party has filed an objection within the period specified by Loc. R. Civ. P. 72.1 IV (b), and the Court agreeing with Magistrate Judge Hart that the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") (1) erred in failing to discuss Camacho's treating practitioner and psychologist's records, and (2) may need to reconsider Camacho's credibility determination in light of these records, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Magistrate Judge Hart's report and recommendation (docket entry # 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. Plaintiff's request for review (docket entry # 8) is GRANTED IN PART;

3. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with Magistrate Judge Hart's report and recommendation; and

4. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case statistically.

BY THE COURT:

Stewart Dalzell , J.


Summaries of

Troche v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 16, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-4483 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Troche v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ISMAEL CAMACHO TROCHE v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 16, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-4483 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 16, 2012)