From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trobock v. Caro

Supreme Court of California
Mar 27, 1882
60 Cal. 304 (Cal. 1882)

Opinion

         Department One

         Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff and from an order denying a new trial in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Latimer, J.

         COUNSEL

          Rosenbaum & Scheeline, for Appellant.

          N. B. Mulville, for Respondent.


         OPINION

         The Court:

         This was an action brought to recover rent due for three months of the year 1879, upon a lease of certain premises in the City and County of San Francisco. The defense was that the lease was void, because the premises were let for an illegal purpose. But the Court found that they were not let for an illegal purpose. Even if there were a conflict of evidence the finding would not be disturbed; but the evidence in the record fully sustains the finding.

         Judgment and order affirmed.


Summaries of

Trobock v. Caro

Supreme Court of California
Mar 27, 1882
60 Cal. 304 (Cal. 1882)
Case details for

Trobock v. Caro

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO TROBOCK v. WOLF CARO

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Mar 27, 1882

Citations

60 Cal. 304 (Cal. 1882)

Citing Cases

Dalzell v. Superior Court

Service of notice of an appeal is a jurisdictional fact; and if service has not been made within statutory…