Triunfo, Inc. v. Glob. Graphic Res.

Full title: TRIUNFO, INC., F.K.A. CATALINA GRAPHIC FILMS, INC., a Nevada corporation…

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 28, 2023

2:19-cv-1164-RFB-DJA (D. Nev. Apr. 28, 2023)

Opinion

2:19-cv-1164-RFB-DJA 2:18-cv-1913-RFB-DJA

04-28-2023

TRIUNFO, INC., F.K.A. CATALINA GRAPHIC FILMS, INC., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. GLOBAL GRAPHIC RESOURCES LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company and DARYL K. HANZAL, an individual, and DOES 1-10, Defendant. GLOBAL GRAPHIC RESOURCES LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company and DARYL K. HANZAL, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. TRIUNFO, INC., F.K.A. CATALINA GRAPHIC FILMS, INC., a Nevada Corporation, Defendant.

FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP ERIC J. NYSTROM, Pro Hac Vice NATALIE I. UHLEMANN, Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Global Graphic Resources LLC and Daryl K. Hanzal. CLARK HILL PLLC NICHOLAS M. WIECZOREK GIA N. MARINA Attorneys for Plaintiff Triunfo, Inc., f.k.a. Catalina Graphic Films, Inc.

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP ERIC J. NYSTROM, Pro Hac Vice NATALIE I. UHLEMANN, Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Global Graphic Resources LLC and Daryl K. Hanzal.

CLARK HILL PLLC NICHOLAS M. WIECZOREK GIA N. MARINA Attorneys for Plaintiff Triunfo, Inc., f.k.a. Catalina Graphic Films, Inc.

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND PROPOSED JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER DEADLINE (FIRST REQUEST)

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Triunfo, Inc., f.k.a. Catalina Graphic Films, Inc. (“Catalina”), by and through its counsel Nicholas M. Wieczorek, Esq. and Gia N. Marina, Esq., of the law firm of Clark Hill PLLC, and Defendants/CrossPlaintiffs Global Graphic Resources LLC (“GGR”) and Daryl K. Hanzal (“Hanzal”), hereby stipulate to extend the pre-trial order deadline for a period of seven (7) days.

Lead counsel for Catalina has been ill for the past week and been physically unable to go into his office for the last three days. Accordingly, counsel has been unable to confer with counsel for Defendant regarding the agreed content of the joint pre-trial order, or respond to various changes and modifications made by counsel regarding the order. In recognition of the fact that the order contemplates direct discussions and agreements between counsel for the parties to the matter, Plaintiff requests a one-week extension to submit the joint pre-trial order containing agreed content.

WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate the deadline for filing the pretrial order be extended up to and including May 5, 2023.

IT IS SO ORDERED.