From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trisvan v. Monroe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 3, 2008
55 A.D.3d 1282 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. CA 08-00448.

October 3, 2008.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Evelyn Frazee, J.), entered May 16, 2007. The order, among other things, granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

FINUCANE HARTZELL, LLP, PITTSFORD (MICHAEL STEINBERG OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

DANIEL M. DE LAUS, JR., COUNTY ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (HOWARD A. STARK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Before: Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Martoche, Green and Gorski, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: When this case was before us on a prior appeal, we determined that defendants, the County of Monroe and its Sheriff, cannot be held liable for the alleged negligence of Sheriffs deputies who were working at the Monroe County Correctional Facility when plaintiffs decedent sustained fatal injuries ( Trisvan v County of Monroe, 26 AD3d 875, lv dismissed 6 NY3d 891). Our determination is "the law of the case and cannot be disturbed on this appeal" ( Scaffold-Russ Dilworth v Shared Mgt. Group, 1 AD3d 951, 952, lv denied 2 NY3d 705; see Young v Tseng, 23 AD3d 552).


Summaries of

Trisvan v. Monroe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 3, 2008
55 A.D.3d 1282 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Trisvan v. Monroe

Case Details

Full title:SARAH D. TRISVAN, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 3, 2008

Citations

55 A.D.3d 1282 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 7316
864 N.Y.S.2d 352

Citing Cases

Kaufmann's Carousel v. Carousel Center Co.

We stated that "the court properly declared that plaintiff[] remained obligated to make contributions to…

Kaufmann's Carousel Inc. v. Carousel Ctr. Co. Lp

“the court properly declared that plaintiff[ ] remained obligated to make contributions to PILOT payments in…