From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tristan di Montenegro v. Murphy

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division
Mar 22, 2023
Civil Action 4:22-cv-476-ALM-KPJ (E.D. Tex. Mar. 22, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 4:22-cv-476-ALM-KPJ

03-22-2023

TRISTAN DI MONTENEGRO, Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN MURPHY, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On March 3, 2023, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and recommendations (the “Report”) (Dkt. #41) that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Phillip Gonzalo Ayala and Kathleen Murphy (Dkt. #17) and the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Matthew DeSarno (Dkt. #27) be granted, and Plaintiff Tristan di Montenegro's claims in this matter be dismissed with prejudice.

Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely objections being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is therefore ORDERED that all of the claims in this action are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

All relief not previously granted is DENIED, and the Clerk is directed to CLOSE this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tristan di Montenegro v. Murphy

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division
Mar 22, 2023
Civil Action 4:22-cv-476-ALM-KPJ (E.D. Tex. Mar. 22, 2023)
Case details for

Tristan di Montenegro v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:TRISTAN DI MONTENEGRO, Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN MURPHY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division

Date published: Mar 22, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 4:22-cv-476-ALM-KPJ (E.D. Tex. Mar. 22, 2023)