From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trischler v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 24, 2015
Case No. 14-12867 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2015)

Summary

holding that "the RFC implicitly encompasses this [ability to perform work on a regular basis] finding" and consequently "[m]ost courts do not require any discussion."

Summary of this case from Mathis v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

Case No. 14-12867

08-24-2015

GENELLE TRISCHLER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


Patricia T. Morris United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 16); (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 14); (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 12)

On June 30, 2015, Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris issued a Report and Recommendation addressing the cross motions for summary judgment in this action. (ECF No. 15, Report and Recommendation; ECF No. 15, Amended Report and Recommendation). In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that this Court grant Defendant Commissioner's motion for summary judgment and deny Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.

The Magistrate Judge then issued an Amended Report and Recommendation on August 19, 2015 to correct a mistype on the first page of the Report but did not alter the Report and Recommendation in any other way. (ECF No. 16). --------

Having thoroughly reviewed the Report and Recommendation and there being no timely objections from either party pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court will adopt the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Amended Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 16), GRANTS Defendant Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 14), DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF. No. 12), and DISMISSES this action with PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Paul D. Borman

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: August 24, 2015

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on August 24, 2015.

s/Deborah Tofil

Case Manager


Summaries of

Trischler v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 24, 2015
Case No. 14-12867 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2015)

holding that "the RFC implicitly encompasses this [ability to perform work on a regular basis] finding" and consequently "[m]ost courts do not require any discussion."

Summary of this case from Mathis v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

finding that a claimant's single-sentence argument was perfunctory and thus waived

Summary of this case from Brown v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

Trischler v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:GENELLE TRISCHLER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 24, 2015

Citations

Case No. 14-12867 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2015)

Citing Cases

Mathis v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Moreover, though the ALJ's decision does not contain an explicit, extended discussion of the Plaintiff's…

Brown v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Given that Brown presents this argument in a single sentence, without explanation or citation to authority, I…