Opinion
2:17-cv-01964-JCM-BNW
10-14-2022
JUSTIN L. TRIPP, Plaintiff, v. CLARK COUNTY, et al Defendants.
TREVOR J. HATFIELD, ESQ Nevada Bar No. 7373 HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD. Attorney for Plaintiff In conjunction with Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada Pro Bono Project
TREVOR J. HATFIELD, ESQ Nevada Bar No. 7373 HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD. Attorney for Plaintiff In conjunction with Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada Pro Bono Project
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO NAPHCARE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF #244) (First Request)
COMES NOW, Plaintiff Justin Tripp (“Plaintiff”), by and through his counsel, the law firm of Hatfield & Associates., Ltd., appearing pro bono publico, and Defendant NaphCare, Inc., Defendant Harry Duran, M.D., Defendant Eric Lopez, P.A., Defendant Rachel Scheiblich, Defendant Kendra Meyer, and Defendant Raymond Mondora, (hereinafter “NaphCare Defendants”), by and through their counsel, the law firm of Medical Defense Law Group, and hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Plaintiff to Respond to the NaphCare Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF #244], due on October 14, 2022 to October 28, 2022.
This request is submitted pursuant to LR IA 6-1, 6-2 and 7-1 and is the parties' first request for an extension of time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment.
Good cause exists for this extension. Plaintiff's counsel is requesting a two (2) week extension of time up to and including October 28, 2022. Plaintiff is incarcerated in F.C.I. Herlong, in Herlong, California and Plaintiff s Counsel has had difficulty communicating with him to formulate an opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. In addition, settlement may be explored whereby the motion may be moot if settlement is reached.
Defendants have courteously granted this extension of time for Plaintiff to file his Response. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall have up to and including October 28, 2022, to respond to NaphCare Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF #244].
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED