Triplett v. River Region Medical Corp.

6 Citing cases

  1. Mohamed v. State

    323 So. 3d 532 (Miss. Ct. App. 2021)   Cited 8 times
    In Mohamed v. State, 323 So. 3d 532, 543 (¶26) (Miss. Ct. App. 2021), reh'g denied (Aug. 3, 2021), this Court stated that "we recognize that "a defendant has a constitutional right to call witnesses in his or her favor."

    Webb v. Braswell , 930 So. 2d 387, 396-97 (¶15) (Miss. 2006) ; Triplett v. River Region Med. Corp ., 50 So. 3d 1032, 1039 (¶30) (Miss. Ct. App. 2010). "We will not reverse the trial court's decision to admit expert testimony unless it was arbitrary and clearly erroneous, amounting to an abuse of discretion."

  2. Todd v. McClain, McClain, McClain, Inc.

    303 So. 3d 448 (Miss. Ct. App. 2020)

    2009) (citing Webb v. Braswell , 930 So. 2d 387, 396-97 (¶15) (Miss. 2006) ); Triplett v. River Region Med. Corp. , 50 So. 3d 1032, 1039 (¶30) (Miss. Ct. App. 2010). A trial court's decision to allow expert testimony will be affirmed "[u]nless we can safely say that the trial court abused its judicial discretion in allowing or disallowing evidence so as to prejudice a party in a civil case[ ] or the accused in a criminal case."

  3. Turner v. State

    292 So. 3d 1006 (Miss. Ct. App. 2020)   Cited 9 times

    2009) (citing Webb v. Braswell , 930 So. 2d 387, 396-97 (¶15) (Miss. 2006) ); Triplett v. River Region Med. Corp. , 50 So. 3d 1032, 1039 (¶30) (Miss. Ct. App. 2010). A trial court’s decision to allow expert testimony will be affirmed "[u]nless we can safely say that the trial court abused its judicial discretion in allowing or disallowing evidence so as to prejudice a party in a civil case[ ] or the accused in a criminal case."

  4. Logan v. Miss. Dep't of Transp. & Miss. Transp. Comm'n

    174 So. 3d 264 (Miss. Ct. App. 2015)

    Viewing the evidence “in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party,” we will reverse only if “triable issues of material fact” exist. Triplett v. River Reg. Med. Corp., 50 So.3d 1032, 1037 (¶ 14) (Miss.Ct.App.2010) (citing Slatery v. Ne. Miss. Contract Procurement, Inc., 747 So.2d 257, 259 (¶ 4) (Miss.1999)). DISCUSSION

  5. Logan v. Miss. Dep't of Transp.

    174 So. 3d 264 (Miss. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 1 times

    Viewing the evidence “in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party,” we will reverse only if “triable issues of material fact” exist. Triplett v. River Reg. Med. Corp., 50 So.3d 1032, 1037 (¶ 14) (Miss.Ct.App.2010) (citing Slatery v. Ne. Miss. Contract Procurement, Inc., 747 So.2d 257, 259 (¶ 4) (Miss.1999) ). DISCUSSION

  6. Logan v. Miss. Dep't of Transp.

    2013-CA-00258-COA (Miss. Ct. App. Sep. 19, 2012)

    Viewing the evidence "in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party," we will reverse only if "triable issues of material fact" exist. Triplett v. River Reg'l Med. Corp., 50 So. 3d 1032, 1037 (¶14) (Miss. Ct. App. 2010) (citing Slatery v. Ne. Miss. Contract Procurement Inc., 747 So. 2d 257, 259 (¶4) (Miss. 1999)).