Triple T., Inc. v. Jaghory

2 Citing cases

  1. Executive Mgmt. v. Ticor Title Ins. Co.

    118 Nev. 46 (Nev. 2002)   Cited 55 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that federal courts’ interpretations of similar federal rules provide persuasive guidance

    Annotation, Application of Statute Denying Access to Courts or Invalidating Contracts Where Corporation Fails to Comply With Regulatory Statute as Affected by Compliance After Commencement of Action, 23 A.L.R. 5th 744, 765 (1994) (reviewing a number of states with statute's similar to Nevada's and noting that "a strong majority of these courts have held that subsequent compliance allows the corporation to continue the suit"); see also Gratrix v. Pine Tree, Inc., 677 P.2d 1264 (Alaska 1984); Johnny's Pizza House, Inc. v. Huntsman, 844 S.W.2d 320 (Ark. 1992); Roldan Corp. N.V. v. District Court, 716 P.2d 120 (Colo. 1986); Triple T., Inc. v. Jaghory, 612 So. 2d 642 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993); Hudson Farms, Inc. v. McGrellis, 620 A.2d 215 (Del. 1993).Compare NRS 80.010, and NRS 80.015, with Model Business Corporation Act Annotated § 15.01 (3d ed. 1997) (hereinafter "Model Act").

  2. Levine v. Levine

    734 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 18 times
    In Levine v. Levine, 734 So.2d 1191, 1197 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), this court discussed the interplay between these sections and stated that if a corporation was administratively dissolved for failing to file its annual report, arguably "section 607.1622(8) would preclude an administratively dissolved corporation's suit on a cause of action accruing after its dissolution."

    Thus, upon reinstatement LZD could proceed on causes of action existing at the time of its dissolution or accruing thereafter. See Babe, Inc. v. Baby's Formula Serv., Inc., 165 So.2d 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964) (holding under predecessor statute that corporation could proceed with suit if it became reinstated prior to dismissal); Triple T., Inc. v. Jaghory, 612 So.2d 642 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). In this regard Gordimer and his firm contend that an administratively dissolved corporation cannot become reinstated more than three years after its dissolution.