From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tripathy v. Feuz

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 26, 2022
21 CIVIL 5349 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 26, 2022)

Opinion

21 CIVIL 5349 (VB)

10-26-2022

SANJAY TRIPATHY, Plaintiff, v. MARIA FEUZ; JACQUELINE REID; LUIS GONZALEZ; JOHN WOOD; EDWARD BURNETT; JEFF MCKOY; TINA M. STANFORD; MICHELLE HARRINGTON; KATHY HOCHUL; RYAN BROTZ; BRIAN MCCALLISTER; and ANTHONY ANNUCCI, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated October 24, 2022, the motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1) is GRANTED as to plaintiff's claims for declaratory and injunctive relief against the Fishkill Defendants. The motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) is GRANTED as to the Fishkill Defendants and the Albany Defendants. The motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(3) is DENIED. The motion to transfer this action as against Dr. Ryan Brotz and the DOCCS Defendants is GRANTED. All claims against the Fishkill Defendants and the Albany Defendants are dismissed. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The action is transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York.


Summaries of

Tripathy v. Feuz

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 26, 2022
21 CIVIL 5349 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Tripathy v. Feuz

Case Details

Full title:SANJAY TRIPATHY, Plaintiff, v. MARIA FEUZ; JACQUELINE REID; LUIS GONZALEZ…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 26, 2022

Citations

21 CIVIL 5349 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 26, 2022)